Which of the following statements regarding a basilar skull fracture is correct?

The statement that the absence of raccoon eyes or Battle's sign does not rule out a basilar skull fracture is correct because the clinical presentation of basilar skull fractures can vary significantly among individuals. While these signs are indicative of potential fractures, particularly in the areas around the eyes and ears, their absence does not definitively exclude the possibility of a fracture.

Basilar skull fractures can occur without displaying these classic symptoms, as not all fractures lead to the additional bruising or bleeding that would result in raccoon eyes or Battle's sign. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals to consider other clinical presentations and imaging studies when assessing for a basilar skull fracture, as depending solely on the presence or absence of these signs could lead to missed diagnoses.